- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 05:32, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Talygen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unable to find reliable, secondary sources to evidence notability under WP:GNG. Additional sources welcomed, as always. j⚛e deckertalk 15:29, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the one source given is a blog entry of three sentences. It does not even say what the sentence with its ref tag says. The article claims there is nothing to download, but if you look on iTunes or Google play, there is indeed a download. The web site does not say mention anything about funding or employees. So who knows, it might be a kid and his buddy trying to do a quickie "app" like everyone else. Not notable yet. W Nowicki (talk) 21:34, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I found no coverage. SL93 (talk) 23:38, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.