Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tan Yinglan (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tan Yinglan

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Tan Yinglan
• Articles for deletion/Tan Yinglan (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Tan Yinglan (3rd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Tan Yinglan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I know this is a shorter than normal re-nom window, but the most recent creator has been blocked and locked for UPE. None of the factors have changed and I'm hoping for more input and therefore resolution after the May no consensus. Star Mississippi 12:43, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and Singapore. Star Mississippi 12:43, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Sources appear to be passing mentions or non-independent/promotional coverage. Not seeing enough to meet WP:GNG. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. Recommending salting based on the SOCKing and UPE. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:10, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The analysis presented last of of the sources from the IP editor clearly show this is not notable. Routine coverage or name drops don't help prove notability. I don't find anything we can use. Oaktree b (talk) 20:21, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Lacks significant coverage in multiple independent sources and fails WP:GNG. Fjnat (talk) 10:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.