Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tango.info

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete keep. There were four valid votes to delete and two valid votes to keep. I earlier miscounted the keep votes as one only. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 01:47, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

nn site, with alexa rankings helpfully included. humblefool®^{Deletion Reform} 04:20, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per submitter. Tempshill 05:31, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, if useless technical details of the site are excluded, we've got little left but mention of it's Alexa ranking. Maybe it can be included as an external link in the Tango article. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:20, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. As MGM said, if you leave out all the useless technical info, we've got little more left than a link, and Wikipedia is not a web guide. --IByte 15:21, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article has been expanded, vote retracted (now neutral, I'm leaving it to other voters.) --IByte 21:20, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non notable EdwinHJ | Talk 00:41, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep:second largest tango information service. article has been expanded, above claims if useless tech is excluded nothin but page rank is left do not apply anymore. For notability see seperate section. If Wikipedia wants to be complete on tango it has to include tango.info. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 18:03, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please note that it is considered polite and in line with Wikipedia policy to state that you are the article's author. --IByte 17:41, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thx, IByte, for pointing me there. Therefore I should also mention that the Tobias Conradi in the imprint of tango.info [1] is me too. All the same Tobias Conradi. And I love tango dancing and going to milongas. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 03:06, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: as per above -Mariano 14:52, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

rank: 365.000, reached after only 9 month of start of service.

365000 is a rank that WP itself only reached almost exactly these 9 month ago [2] .

Additional the number of websites increases steadily (August Report of NetCraft) If Wikipedia wants not to prefer big sites but rather the top XY percent, the allowed traffic rank number has to be adjusted steadily. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 23:55, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• free data download at http://open.tango.info
• multilingual structure (other large tango pages are either in english, spanish or german)
• detecting same pieces of music on different CDs, important for DJs and collectionists, because there are so many different publishings with different quality levels.

High rankings for tango related searches in google:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.