- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:07, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Along with Jimmy Blackmon. Ehh, this article about a TV show yet to air gives no claim to notability. Neither does the article about its creator. They probably merit a delete. Are public access TV shows inherently notable? Matt Yeager 09:09, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete verifiable speculation Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 17:52, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- RELISTING for more discussion. Renata3 06:19, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I would say that public-access television shows, which typically have such low viewership that it can't even be measured by standard rating services, are presumptively non-notable unless evidence is provided that they have become notable. --Metropolitan90 08:54, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both unaired series and creator. Program as crystal ball and self promotion, creator for failing WP:BIO, and each other by association. Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 09:56, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --Pboyd04 15:38, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, although it is near premiere, unverifiable (blogs are not usually good sources). -- ReyBrujo 02:39, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.