- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus; keep. Johnleemk | Talk 15:00, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
nnbio; his claim to fame is that he is an online columnist and reviewer of Bollywood films. A google search gives 30,100 hits as his reviews are on popular websites that get picked up by the blogger communities. However, note that not a single hit on Google (atleast not in the first 20) has any information on him. Looks like he is also either liked passionately or disliked intensely by a lot by people influenced by his reviews - article has become a vandalism magent of late Gurubrahma 12:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I feel he is notable. I did a quick google. I found lot of blogs link to his reviews and relate to what he said on Indiafm. Like you said, I did see a lot of dislike towards him. But vandalism should not be a reason a page gets deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ganeshk (talk • contribs)
- Keep Extremely notable if the facts stated are correct and the nominator isn't disputing them. CalJW 14:48, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The point is, we don't have even a single bit of information about him apart from the fact that he writes for indiafm.com. Is it notable by itself?? Just as we shouldn't vote delete due to a low google count, similarly we shouldn't vote keep due to a high google count. I am all for a keep vote if - his notability is established; and we can get access to some biographical data abt him. --Gurubrahma 14:59, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment : Is the Lions Award that he won with Shahrukh etc famous ? Tintin Talk 15:15, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I haven't heard of this award before. I don't think these are famous. btw, "Lion awards" alone gives lots of google hits - most of them refering to the Cannes' lions. --Gurubrahma 16:29, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- With all due respect, appears to be a vanity material. Sorry, but agree with User:Gurubrahma on the nnbio point. --ΜιĿːtalk 17:09, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: not notable, at least now, to command an entry here. Such contents are veiled advertisement. --Bhadani 08:24, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Seems notable. This does need major clean up, NPOV and better references.Obina 22:00, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.