- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:49, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- TargetPoint (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to meet WP:WEB, being exclusively existing article in its form (ads for bittorents) makes it look as ads promotion. 'Notability' tag was placed in November 2009, if it had notability the authors could've shown it by now. Userpd (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note to Admin: - The AFD was submitted without a notice placed on the article. I have added the AFD notice to the article, and the time for this AFD listing should be adjusted accordingly. -- Whpq (talk) 14:57, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable business, article referenced to bittorrent blogs. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:43, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As above, not a notable business, no coverage in reliable secondary sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:23, 1 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.