Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tate Birchmore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:54, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tate Birchmore

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actor who falls under WAY too soon, though I'm sure someday he will deserve his own page. Wgolf (talk) 23:13, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree with nom, Way too soon to assume notability and no notability now. Young child actor maybe someday but not today. Bryce Carmony (talk) 06:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:40, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No significant coverage in notable reliable independent sources. Softlavender (talk) 08:15, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NACTOR --Surturz (talk) 12:17, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - "Tate Birchmore is a rising star in the entertainment industry" .... Created by a company to promote the BLP. Delete. –Davey2010^Talk 15:46, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.