- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Redirect to Tate Gallery after all useful content (one fact) has been merged. Deathphoenix ʕ 19:52, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
The Tate's website is no more notable than that of any other museum. None of the criteria on Wikipedia:Notability (web) are met. HAM 
18:25, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, unless any of the info can be used on The Tate's page (I haven't checked, because I'm lazy), in which case, merge. -- Kicking222 18:28, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Terrific image database, but other major museums have similar online collections, though perhaps not as well done as this Bwithh 18:37, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to Tate Gallery, now that I have merged the one interesting fact - that it "holds digital versions of many of the holdings as well as detailed information on exhibitions". Sandstein 18:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect per Sandstein.--Andeh 19:28, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect/Merge per Sandstien. - Kookykman|(t)e
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.