- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 23:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Tatoeba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
May well be of notability, but current sources bar one are primary; multiple secondary sources need to be found for this article to be kept. Jay Σεβαστόςdiscuss 12:39, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I refer to Tatoeba.org in several peer reviewed academic papers. In one (unfortunately in Japanese) it gets a couple of paragraphs. I think they should count as multiple secondary sources. I have added some of them to the page. Francis Bond (talk) 13:12, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I went ahead and added a few more sources as well. Papabearrr (talk) 13:28, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep --Hans W (talk) 10:31, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.