Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatzic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Harro5 22:47, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

non-notable; article's assertion that there is a "whole conculture" surrounding the made-up language is irrelevant because a conculture is, by definition, also imaginary. [1]. Adunar 10:34, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete nn bollocks Jamie ^{(talk/contribs)} 11:08, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. If the original author is still around, is there any more information that could be posted regarding the criteria listed at Wikipedia:Conlangs/Straw_poll, anything that makes it particularly notable? --Interiot 11:12, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.