- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 13:33, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Tavex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 17:46, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: An article with no claim of notability, created by a WP:SPA with an acknowledged conflict of interest, and sourced only to the firm's own website. The equivalant page created 3 days later on the Finnish Wikipedia is no better. No evidence of notability found. AllyD (talk) 19:10, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:41, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:41, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mkdwtalk 23:30, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 11:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.