Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Blitz Breakfast
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –MuZemike 19:45, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Team Blitz Breakfast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Very forgettable product that isn't notable and probably not available in most of the world (or most of the USA, for that matter) D O N D E groovily Talk to me 03:09, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect to Tabatchnick would more sense to me. JDOG555 (talk) 04:26, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It's best, of course, not to merge something that will get deleted anyway, and I think this content would be deleted from the target article by a conscientious editor. Thus, I would prefer a redirect, if anything. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 05:28, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as having insufficient coverage in independent third-party sources. If such sources are integrated into the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:54, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.