- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:11, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Team Brasa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A poor one line article with no source which should've been deleted years ago. Dwanyewest (talk) 02:28, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 18:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —Astudent0 (talk) 13:27, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I did a search for sources, and the only one I came up with is actually blocked by our spam filter. Oh dear. It does provide coverage, albeit in an indirect way, but isn't sufficient, on its own, to show that the team passes WP:ORG or WP:N, both of which require multiple sources. Ironholds (talk) 21:13, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I found no independent sources that show notability. This is an unsourced article that doesn't make a real claim of notability ("successful" is far too vague). Astudent0 (talk) 13:26, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article gives no concrete reason why the team is notable and has no sources. My search found nothing that shows notability that's supported by reliable sources. Papaursa (talk) 17:14, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.