Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technically speaking

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:28, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Technically speaking

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deletion process begun by an IP, who said "Considering that the article has numerous (pre-tagged) issues, that it has remained a stub for quite some time, that its relevancy and importance seem very low, and that I have never heard of "technically speaking" as anything than a turn of phrase, I suggest deletion. 94.220.240.23 (talk) 02:30, 16 December 2009 (UTC)". Article topic is a webpage on the NSF website on how to give good presentations. Abductive (reasoning) 04:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems to be non-notable web content. Anything relevent can be covered by a single sentance or two in the NSF article. --Jayron32 04:49, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with Jayron32 completely. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 11:01, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lacking in sources to show notability despite being tagged for over a year. It is hard to search for such a common phrase and get relevant results, but a few attempts (combining the phrase with the name of the school that hosts it, for example) suggest there is little to no coverage in searchable reliable sources, which is a very bad sign considering that this is online content. --RL0919 (talk) 20:19, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.