Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Techniques to accelerate solution of governing differential equations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete pursuant to G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 20:25, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Techniques to accelerate solution of governing differential equations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

At best, original research. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:15, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Poorly written essay/OR. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:39, 11 November 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Comment See also recently speedied articles ACCELERATION TECHNIQUES and Acceleration techniques, as well as Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Acceleration techniques. Ruby Murray 11:11, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm not sure which "governing differential equations" this very poor WP:ESSAY is about, but whatever the subject is, I'm pretty sure we have articles covering it. I might have suggested userfying, but the article author is indef-blocked for abusing multiple accounts. -- 101.119.14.211 (talk) 14:03, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article closely follows the Acceleration chapter in this Computational Fluid Dynamics textbook, but may not be an actual copyvio. Strangely, the book is not cited, so there is a kind of plagiarism here. Verified content belongs in the section Computational fluid dynamics#Solution algorithms, where a number of the acceleration techniques are already mentioned. Some of the refs might be worth merging, but because there are no inline citations, it's unclear exactly what they are contributing. While optimization of CFD simulations is a notable topic, I'm not sure that this article has much to contribute, and the near plagiarism motivates me to consider blowing it up per WP:TNT and WP:ESSAY. --Mark viking (talk) 17:09, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this OR. Cheers, AstroCog (talk) 22:11, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.