Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technocracy: Void Engineers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:48, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Technocracy: Void Engineers

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on a game is currently sourced to one questionably RS reference. A BEFORE on Google News, Google Books, JSTOR, and newspapers.com fails to find additional references. Fails GNG. Chetsford (talk) 19:15, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 19:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 19:34, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:GNG as it only has one source and I cannot find any others. N0nsensical.system^(err0r?)_(.log) 09:49, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:16, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or at most redirect to List of Mage: The Ascension books. Fram (talk) 15:34, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Since the review has already been merged into List of Mage: The Ascension books, that seems like a reasonable way to go here. BOZ (talk) 22:00, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.