Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technology vs. Horse
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete per unanimous vote. --JForget 23:15, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Technology vs. Horse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Yet another "myspace-band", references are poor. Albums are self-published. Fribbler (talk) 23:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - could not find reliable sources; 89 g-hits.-Samuel Tan 01:29, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails the notability criteria at WP:MUSIC, no reliable sources to be seen. See related discussion here. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:29, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 01:31, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Off-key in regard to WP:Music. The article reads like marketing collateral, not an encyclopedia entry. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per WP:Music --Vh
oscythechatter 11:53, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply] - Delete per Samuel Tan. No reliable sources can be found. -- iMatthew T.C. 00:31, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.