- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus to delete the article. Mailer Diablo 00:24, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
80-odd unique Googles, some of which look a bit suspect. I call non-notable. Just zis Guy you know? 23:55, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. PJM 02:58, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It seems interesting and usefull. --Bduke 05:37, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, 28,800 google hits [1]. Kappa 13:21, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, that removes the irrelevant ones, leaving 62 unique Googles, including "get caught masterbating" wose relevance I was somewhat hesitant to investigate further. Just zis Guy you know? 13:45, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- "Unique Google hits" aren't a credible measure of a search term, for reasons I've elucidated elsewhere. That said, I'm not convinced of the notability here, but unique google hits shouldn't be the benchmark.
- — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 01:33, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, that removes the irrelevant ones, leaving 62 unique Googles, including "get caught masterbating" wose relevance I was somewhat hesitant to investigate further. Just zis Guy you know? 13:45, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.