- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 03:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- TeePublic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability as per WP:NCORP. Most references rely on interviews with the founder and/or people associated with the company. Others are standard announcements on funding/acquisition. HighKing++ 17:01, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:12, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:12, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:GNG with articles in TechCrunch, ArsTechnica and New York Magazine — Ad Meliora Talk∕Contribs 21:57, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: The Business Insider and ArsTechnica sources present in the article demonstrate notability. — Toughpigs (talk) 02:39, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The subject of the article very clearly receives significant coverage in verifiable independent sources. WP:NCORP does not supersede WP:GNG when GNG criteria is established. --Tsistunagiska (talk) 19:50, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.