Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teen podcasters network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. → Ξxtreme Unction {^yakł_blah} 14:48, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No obvious notability. 293 hits on google. Ben Aveling 22:17, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete nn. Harro5 22:20, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete. Does not appear to be noteworthy enough. Jtmichcock 01:04, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delet NN. -- Dalbury^(Talk) 16:03, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep it. I wrote this article (Me, Michael Fogleman). Originally I put up this article as a massive about. My thoughts are, if someone is looking for the Teen Podcaster's Network, they will find what they want with no biased information. The Podcast Network gets the same thing, why shouldn't the Teen Podcaster's Network? It just says what it is, who made it, and where to find it, nothing else. 68.160.157.98 01:00, 4 December 2005 (UTC)Michael Fogleman[reply]
  • Comment Wikipedia is not a directory service. -- Dalbury^(Talk) 01:47, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • CommentWell why is the Teen Podcaster's Network getting picked on if the Podcast Network does not? It should not be deleted because if someone wants to know about the network, they will find out about it. It's not slanted in any way whatsoever and should not be deleted. Just because it is "obscure" doesn't mean that people won't look at it. Wikipedia is so messed up, and it has strayed from it's original purpose- the beauty of everyone being able to edit it if they have a contribution. Shame on you for picking on Adam Curry. He was just trying to help. I defended Wikipedia from my history teacher, who complained about it. I almost got in trouble for it. I don't see why I did if you cannot do what you are supposed to be able to- put your two cents in. You exclusive supposed elite who spend your days editing Wikipedia are the only people who have any rights. While it may be fun, why can't a leading expert make edits? That's what I ask. I'd be interesting in chatting with you folks about it. Email me at michael@teenpodcasters.com or skype me at commonercast. 68.160.180.33 19:53, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • CommentI have now gotten a user. My user is commonercast. Commonercast 19:59, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

1. Delete NN vanity --rogerd 00:26, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.