Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tehran: Another Side
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 13:56, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Tehran: Another Side (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While this film exists, and there is a solitary gnews hit, I can't find sufficient substantial RS coverage to meet our notability standards. Others are welcome to try. Epeefleche (talk) 08:06, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete, this film must be verified and it doesn't at the moment, but if that can be overcome, keep.LuciferWildCat (talk) 18:43, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You say delete but tagged it for rescue. If you believe there is an actual chance references or other proof of notability can be found, then you use the rescue tag. Dream Focus 23:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I gather, from his comment, that he does not see refs that verify that it has notability (which is why he !voted delete), but is hoping that others will be able to.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Available references consist of two brief mentions in promotional materials for film festivals where this film was screened. No significant coverage in reliable, independent sources has been identified. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 08:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Google search turned up nothing except PR material. Nothing adequate for establishing notability. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 09:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - After some searches, not finding coverage in reliable sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:25, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.