Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telecommunications tower
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:18, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Telecommunications tower (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article has multiple issues and should be redirected to Radio masts and towers which covers the same material in greater depth. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nom following advice below. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:15, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (📧) 13:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Hmm, why is this being brought to AfD? Redirect, not deletion, is being proposed. Redirect seems pretty reasonable. Me, I would boldly redirect and withdraw the AfD to save other editors the time and effort. Just a thought. --
{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk}
22:07, 15 February 2020 (UTC) - Redirect per nom. Hog Farm (talk) 00:41, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep (procedural), wrong forum, nominator should have followed the guidelines at WP:REDIRECT. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:09, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.