- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Tiptoety talk 04:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tempus (MUD) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Online game without evidence of notability; fails WP:WEB. Note: The article survived a mass nomination last year, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AVATAR (MUD). Tagged with {{notability}} since July 2007. B. Wolterding (talk) 22:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Definitely fails WP:WEB notability per [1] and [2]. Just blogspots, directors, unreliable sources, some forums etc..etc.. Wisdom89 (T / C) 22:32, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 22:32, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 22:32, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No references or even statements in the article itself that really set it apart from other MUDs in a truly notable way. ◄Zahakiel► 23:13, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:57, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no assertion of notability to satisfy WP:WEB. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 01:53, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no secondary coverage or other asssertion of notability; fails WP:WEB and should be deleted. Percy Snoodle (talk) 08:29, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.