- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete - Liberatore(T) 14:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Auto-bio. Vanity. Non-notable. 327 Google hits. Haakon 11:16, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BIO. PJM 12:41, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable games designer/illustrator, verified by Google. If Wikipedia was limited to subjects that Google showed were already well-documented, it wouldn't be good for much. So fix whatever you don't like about the article. Monicasdude 15:03, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete Verifiable games illustrator. But is he notable? I'm not so sure but can be convinced. Marcus22 20:08, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I have more Google hits for my name on the games I have published than this guy has, and I'm not claiming I'm notable enough for my own Wikipedia entry. RGTraynor 20:17, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 19:12, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.