Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tessolve (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:10, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tessolve

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Tessolve
• Articles for deletion/Tessolve (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Tessolve (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

End-to-end WP:PROMO. Lack WP:SIGCOV, WP:ORGIND, and WP:RS. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. Also... if not delete, then merging it with Hero MotoCorp is the next best solution. - Hatchens (talk) 11:39, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 11:39, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of any notability. Springnuts (talk) 11:48, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:51, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: An article on a company acquired 6 years ago by a subsidiary of Hero MotoCorp. This article has featured successive waves of promotional editing, including an overwrite(now reverted) by a new WP:SPA since this AfD began. Searches find announcement-based coverage of financial transactions [1] and product partnerships [2] but these fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. I am not seeing specific notability for this firm, and a redirect or merge to the parent of the parent, while an AtD, seems a stretch. AllyD (talk) 09:58, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete AllyD says it all really, bottom line is this topic fails NCORP's notability criteria, references fail to provide for in-depth coverage containing "Independent Content". HighKing⁺⁺ 12:51, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.