- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 18:27, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Test seat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Important, but does not qualify as notable. Merge with amusement park. Wer900 talkessay on the definition of consensus 18:59, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 April 10. Snotbot t • c » 19:17, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: the mentioning of a test seat might be relevant in individual amusement ride articles but it certainly doesn't warrant its own article. Themeparkgc Talk 07:40, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:50, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I feel it doesn't deserve much mentioning. If a ride/roller coaster has one of then it can be included in the queue section or something but I agree it is not very notable for its own article.--Astros4477 (talk) 02:30, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a simply dictionary definition. Not necessary to have an encyclopedia article on this concept. Eluchil404 (talk) 06:56, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.