- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Valley2city‽ 17:05, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Testwell CMT++ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:Notability not apparent. No substantive Google hits. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:07, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:45, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination: non-notable, non-consumer software - static code analysis tools which measure the code complexity for software written in C, C++ and Java - referenced only to internal sites. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:34, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 20:29, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.