Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tetr.io

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of Tetris variants. ✗plicit 14:19, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tetr.io

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Tetr.io (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NGAME, with no independent reviews or coverage besides listacles found on this article or in my WP:BEFORE searches. Previous blank and redirects were reverted. -1ctinus📝🗨 14:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:41, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to List of Tetris variants. Besides what's in the article, I also found [1] and [2], but it's just a lot of listicles where nobody has written anything substantial or over two paragraphs about the game. ~ A412 ^talk! 16:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of Tetris variants#Unofficial games (or an anchor, given the list's length) as it was before, where the game's already mentioned. Definitely does not meet WP:NGAME per nom. (As a disclaimer, I created Tetr.io as that redirect before it became an article.) Nyakase🐈‍⬛‍ (talk • she/her) 16:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of Tetris variants. No real SIGCOV here, just listicles. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect as above. Listicles can support notability though, they just tend to lack significant coverage as is the case here. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 22:14, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per all. A mention at the target could be a compromise. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:44, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.