Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tetrisification

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:11, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

neologism, and a pretty thin one at that, article even admits that it's rare. This was tagged with a speedy>neologism but it really doesn't belong there. Rx StrangeLove 02:37, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nominator. --File:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy 04:33, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It admits to being a neologism.- Mgm|^(talk) 08:33, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.