- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Would also need complete rewrite to even become coherent prose. Sandstein (talk) 21:03, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Text Banner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Verges closer to G11, even though the page content seems legitimate at first glance. Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 02:29, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hard to say. I can't say it's G11 because there's no specific company mentioned, nor linked to. This might be a notable topic, though; if it was written with better grammar, I might be able to tell. Powers T 03:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Comment The way this is written it seems as if text banner IS some kind of a company. I'm wondering if this should be a mention in an article on text ads in general using the third party sources for google, yahoo and adbrite ads to easily establish notability for the "genre". As the article stands right now I think we should sink it. If it is deleted I'll consider helping to start it over in a more viable form.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 07:30, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with recreate option Per Above. Five Years 11:42, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.