- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 23:36, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thandiakkal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete unsourced one-liner about a surname with no indication of why it's notable. Surnames are not inherently notable. We're not the Indian telephone directory. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Salih (talk) 07:54, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable local family name. Salih (talk) 04:03, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:41, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No notability established for this family name Corpx (talk) 05:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
&Delete Just as a name, it's not notable. If there were several notable people with the name, the it could become a List of people with surname Jones article, but not yet. Priyanath talk 02:01, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.