- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:52, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- ThatAussieGuy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable internet personality. No independent reliable sources are provided to support the claims to notability. The article appears to be self-promotional in nature Mattinbgn\talk 22:41, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\talk 22:42, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete--totally not notable. Drmies (talk) 22:44, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete almost reads like blatant self promotion. fails WP:BIO badly Michellecrisp (talk) 23:04, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a nobody per WP:NOT#USER.--Sting Buzz Me... 23:27, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above I have same reservations--VS talk 05:44, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.