- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-18 08:21Z
- TheCollegeWeb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Delete: The site this article is about is defunct and the new site isn't in any way notable. A vanity page from the beginning. Korranus 03:42, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no hits on Google News Archive, fails WP:WEB. --Dhartung | Talk 10:06, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The website in fact works. I just looked at it. It meets WP:N on the basis of multiple independent and verifiable coverage in reliable sources where it is the primary subject. Inkpaduta 18:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The only references seem to be college newspapers. NetOracle 01:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Inkpaduta. Mathmo Talk 06:14, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Quarl (talk) 09:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep because of the references. YechielMan 19:36, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - the website works just fine; and the references establish notability (even if somewhat limited). -- Black Falcon 21:02, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the references provided by Inkpaduta. Meets WP:WEB guidelines. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:47, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.