Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The ATOM Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter (banter) @ 19:14, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The ATOM Project

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While IMO a good intention project it's not-notable at this time. It's one of any number of stop ATOM bomb building alliances/projects. Formed in 2012 by Kazakhstan President. References all seem to lead back to the President's policy center. Caffeyw (talk) 10:35, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:35, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Being one of a number of projects does not mean it isn;t notable. It seems a major foreign policy initiative of the government sponsoring it. A proper effort should be made to get other refs, though there will be language difficulties. DGG ( talk ) 23:28, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kazakhstan has been a world leader on anti-nuclear issues. For example they initiated, through the United Nations, International Day Against Nuclear Testing. They are not just any anti-nuke group. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 06:26, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 19:09, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per DGG, Green Cardamom. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 20:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Post-close comment: you guys know this whole thing was a copyright violation right? sigh. Wizardman 17:19, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.