Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Amazing Pizza Machine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, references have been corrected and article expanded to establish notability after the only delete opinion was made. Davewild (talk) 08:24, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Amazing Pizza Machine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Asserts notability but no verifiable references, in fact no references at all. ukexpat (talk) 22:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually there are references, the editor just forgot to place a reflist tag.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 23:03, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Definetly not notable enough.--Carerra^carerra 22:19, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• WeakStrong keepchange to Strong keep. National industry awards are mentioned at the end of the article and citations are mentioned. The article needs to be wikified, not deleted. - I wikified the article - its good to go, and this is a recognized leader business in its field. • Freechild'sup? 00:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 01:27, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I haven't reviewed all the sources or the nature of the award, so I have no opinion (yet) to keep. However, there is at least one reliable source with significant coverage[1]. That alone isn't enough to prove notability (IMO) but if you find a few more or weigh it with other stuff, it's possibly notable. A 65,000 square foot entertainment venue is fairly big and its part of a "family entertainment" trend, so the subject matter is nominally encyclopedia. Wikidemo (talk) 03:07, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.