Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Behavior Asylum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I would be happy to userfy it upon request. J04n(talk page) 10:37, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Behavior Asylum

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film does not have stand-alone notability, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 16:36, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- The film is notable as of references on other official encyclopedia based websites here. User:H.Brian Griffin ^talk^|^contribs 16:53, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment- this seems to have been written by somebody close to the subject? Otherwise, where has the information come from? It seems very unreferenced/original researchy. Secondly, WP:CRYSTAL, and why is there the need to write about upcoming film? If/when it gets released, OK, but we've got another year until that happens and there are press reviews of it to reference. WP:TOOSOON!. And WP:FFILM. At that point, it may meet WP:NF, but it doesn't appear to now. Barney the barney barney (talk) 18:07, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/Userfy- for a while. I thank User:H.Brian Griffin for his contribution,[1] but lacking significant coverage in independent reliable sources, we have a failure of WP:NF that does not merit being an exception to WP:NFF. Sorry H.Brian, but even with the film being "slated" for a January 2014 festival screening, it simply lacks the requisite independent coverage. Allow back only when WP:NF can be met. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:55, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Userfy- per Schmidt. There isn't anything to show notability, but there's no harm in the editor userfying it.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:00, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.