Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Blonde Is Back...

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete (again) under G3 as a hoax and salted HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:37, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Blonde Is Back... (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any evidence that this album exists, let alone that a title and/or tracklist exist such that this would pass WP:CRYSTAL. Borderline G3 candidate, in my opinion, although my uncertainty makes me cautious about nominating it for CSD. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 07:12, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Article appears to have been speedily-deleted and then rapidly re-created. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 07:21, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I saw that too... although I don't think it's a hoax... so the AfD is appropriate. Shadowjams (talk) 07:51, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Add to nomination, What Up Girl which is a single off of this putative album. Shadowjams (talk) 07:51, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete per nom. This article was recreated after being deleted as a hoax. The single, What Up Girl is also a blatant hoax as there are NO references at all. I even nominated that for G3. The way that The Blonde Is Back... is written also indicates a hoax. ToxicWasteGrounds 08:46, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. --  -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 14:16, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I don't feel this is sufficently obvious a hoax for a G3, but not by much. However, if an admin decides to delete them as such, it wouldn't bother me though. I've added {{hoax}} tags to both of them as I can't find any sources to verify their veracity. Even if they weren't hoaxes, they certainly don't qualify for pre-release articles (see the notability guidelines for albums) -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 14:31, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.