Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Buyer Utility Map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 16:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a student essay — original research. Delete. Seems to be a mate to Business planning (an integrated plan approach). -- RHaworth 11:46, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 12:15, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 13:15, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to make clear that my article is no original research but the result of a literature study (see references at the end of the article). More argumentation can be found at Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Method_engineering as this article is part of this project. What should I do to contribute to the wikipedia ecyclopedia with my article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rgiesen (talk • contribs)

Root it in Real Life rather than academic hypothesis. Cite documented instances in which this paradigm has been used (or has been disproved for a specific microcosm), so that a reader could relate it to their own experience. -- Simon Cursitor 07:30, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: see debate at Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Method Engineering Encyclopedia. -- RHaworth 11:30, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I'd like to ask that this nomination be withdrawn or put on hold pending centralized discussion. It's not just one page in question; it's a fairly large number, all related. John Reid 13:48, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  I sympathise with your general position, but if one or more of the articles (such as this one) shouldn't be here, then shouldn't we delete them? --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 17:02, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• In view of the discussion at Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Method Engineering Encyclopedia, I endorse deletion of this article (and associated ME material]], with their transfer to an ME-wiki of their own. -- Simon Cursitor 07:24, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NOR. SorryGuy 04:31, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. Only one article has been published about it and I have some WP:OR concerns over the section Buyer_utility_map#The_buyer_utility_map_process. —Ruud 18:23, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.