Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Clinton Political Machine
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 21:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The Clinton Political Machine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Page violates WP:NPOV. Wikipedia is not a soap box. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 01:01, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete-ish. There's a potential article here, as there really is a "Clinton political machine" that's separate from the Democrat Party. But this article ain't it. It's too short, it's unreferenced, and it says nothing about the successes of the machine. For now, move it to Clinton political machine (per WP:MOS) and make it redirect it to Hillary Rodham Clinton#Presidential campaign of 2008. Argyriou (talk) 01:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. While there may be a potential article about the key supporters and tactics of Clinton (either or both), this is just a grab-bag of unsourced allegations/claims. --Dhartung | Talk 09:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: This is nonsense. The Democratic Leadership Council is "the Clinton machine." People should know better than to repackage for malign, slang terminology. If people read the Bill Clinton article first, they know that his political ideology and ideas came from there and that this was a break from the "traditional" Democratic Party. Utgard Loki (talk) 15:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as poorly-sourced neologism. Majoreditor (talk) 18:16, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per Utgard, this is nonsense. Poorly sourced. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nonsense Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 22:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.