Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Colbert Effect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 12:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Colbert Effect (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Completely redundant; everything in this article (except for the "Colbert Bump," which can be merged if need be) has been adequately covered in The Colbert Report#Cultural impact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoemoney2night (talk • contribs) 09:36, 30 November 2007

Delete - it is covered already. mattbuck (talk) 10:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Everything there is (shouldbe?) covered in colberts article. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -RiverHockey 19:50, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge and Transwiki to wikiality.com 132.205.99.122 21:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Nothing indicates that merging would be appropriate. Wryspy 22:24, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for multiple reasons. It's covered. It riddled with original research. It's a neologism. Majoreditor 22:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. As has been mentioned, almost all the content already exists in The Colbert Report page. --Powerlord 08:54, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and apply the Wikipedia Effect. RFerreira 08:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.