Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The CommonLine Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  06:09, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The CommonLine Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Completely non-notable website. There are a number of sources given, but none of them meets WP:RS, being blogs and forums and associated sites. A Google presence exists, but in plowing through it for twenty minutes I haven't been able to dig up one single WP:RS. So the notability is not in the cards for this one. Qworty (talk) 03:00, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Verifiability is an issue for this article which does not cite any reliable sources. Stifle (talk) 22:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I was ready to argue that commonsense application of WP:RS would expand the definition to include subject-specific authoritative sources. In other words, a few good mentions from quality poetry sources would be fine. But, alas, this article fails here also. --AnnaFrance (talk) 15:39, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:58, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:58, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.