- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 22:14, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod, nominated as failing WP:WEB. Delete TheKoG (talk|contribs) 17:49, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Forum was recently restarted, has had over 1000 members at a time. Would have to get over 20 unique hits as there have been more members posting at a time then that on April 1st. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RavenM (talk • contribs) .
- Comment If it only has about 30 active members then it certainly does not meet inclusion criteria for the Wikipedia. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 17:59, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. Very badly written, too. Slowmover 18:06, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - 156 registered users does not a notable forum make. Zetawoof(ζ) 18:18, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. google returns 20,000 hits, of which 20 are unique, the rest being stats and counters. bikeable (talk) 18:25, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Per Nom and Per TheKog, Bkieable, SlowMover and ZetaWoof. Also this is Advertising a its worst! Aeon 18:27, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Deli nk 00:05, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.