Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Development Productions
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:08, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The Development Productions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no indication of W:notability. Main contributor has an apparent WP:conflict of interest. No independent WP:reliable sources. Google has very few hits. noq (talk) 00:04, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Could possibly be speedied, since it hasn't been proposed or prodded before; I think it's borderline spam, but I'm not in a rush. Drmies (talk) 01:04, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.
- Delete. Spam is not borderline at all: The Development employs unconventional production techniques and methodologies in constructing content. As a result, the studio's output is marked by its non-tradtional structures. Content is centered around observation of the human condition/experience: uncertainty, drama, humor and the extremity of human emotion. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:14, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.