Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dimitri Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. bainer (talk) 03:36, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOT crystal ball

• Delete as per my nom. Dlyons493 Talk 03:06, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - verified here [1]. Definite name for computer game release that is definitely going to be released and is definitely notable. Simple. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 15:30, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh, and 120 google hits, all relevant suggests its real. The crystal ball thing is irrelevant in this case. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 15:31, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as potential vaporware and per nom. When it is released it can get an article. Until then it is speculation and rumor. Crystal ball applies to all future events. Peyna 16:11, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• The article that Zordrac links to above tells us outright that there isn't anything actually known about this purported game. Unverifiable. Delete. Uncle G 20:49, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. -- Dalbury^(Talk) 02:26, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete While I believe that the game is 'real' (meaning it is being worked on), until it has a final title it doesn't merit an article. Perhaps merge with Lionhead Studios? --SirNuke 04:25, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Zordrac. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 02:26, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Its a game in development, it could do with a little more detail though, like the fact that the project is named after Molyneux's nephew... Markusdragon 00:15, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The details may be sketchy, but it exists, and even though not much is known about it now, there's no point in deleting an article that will just be recreated when move info is available anyway. Just keep it around and edit it as more info becomes available. --sonicstormer 08:55, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, notable.  Grue  20:16, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.