Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Evolution of Artistic Communities - One Example
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete per WP:SNOW. Nick Dowling (talk) 06:36, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The Evolution of Artistic Communities - One Example (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Appears to be an essay piece in violation of WP:NOR. The general topic may be workable, but using "one example" in the title would appear to indicate that the article will be forever narrow in scope and unable to redeem itself from WP:OR. Taroaldo (talk) 04:40, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete essay, junk it. JuJube (talk) 04:42, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - totally non-encyclopedic content. --Orange Mike | Talk 04:42, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - essay and violates WP:OR. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 04:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete Wow--where did you ever find this one? It looks like the assignment was "Log onto Wikipedia and just start typing about whatever you feel like typing about." Qworty (talk) 05:14, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- On a quick peruse through one page of Recent Changes the title caught my eye and it sounded so much like the title of a paper you might find in any social sciences undergrad class that I had to check it out. And sure enough.... Everyone should have to read and understand WP:NOT before being able to create an article. ;) --- Taroaldo (talk) 05:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:OR. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 10:54, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, gently. It sounds to me like the author of this piece knows something about Warrandyte, Victoria, and might be able to add productively to that article. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\talk 23:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the essay. Possible origional research? --Starionwolf (talk) 01:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Almost certainly original research (at the least no sources are supplied) and not an encyclopaedia article. Perhaps suitable for userfying should the editor wish to try and have another shot at writing an article on the topic. -- Mattinbgn\talk 01:22, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.