Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ivy Tree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 22:41, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Ivy Tree

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The notability of this book is not stated Oddbodz (talk) 21:39, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I have found the following sources, which seem to establish notability: 1, 2, 3, 4. Source 2 also mentions a few reviews - I'm sure we could find those, too. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 22:07, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Author's name being misspelled and not wikilinked probably didn't help anything any, but this appears to be a notable book by a notable author. Jclemens (talk) 02:11, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WP:NBOOK is clearly met. The novel has been reviewed in The Atlantic Monthly, The Christian Science Monitor, and The New York Times Book Review as well as Kirkus Reviews, Library Journal, The Washington Post, and New York Herald Tribune according to [1]. Goodvac (talk) 08:09, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Highly notable author whose books were widely reviewed at the time of their publication. It's a waste of effort to insist on tracking down individual 50-year-old reviews. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 04:38, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.