Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Modifyers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:27, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Modifyers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Television pilot rejected by Nickelodeon. No indication of notability. Article is largely unsourced and speculative. Trivialist (talk) 19:17, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:50, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, references cited in the article are all IMDb, see Wikipedia:Citing IMDb. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:53, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong DELETE This article is irrelevant. Thousands of television pilots get rejected yearly, we can't give every single one it's own wiki page. Also the only sources of reference are the all from IMDb, which doesn't denote much credibility. 80.249.56.149 (talk) 15:30, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Leave it be "No indication of notability"? A damn porn parody was made of it, it has a big cult following. 213.22.97.72 (talk) 01:05, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you provide any evidence of this "damn porn parody"? Trivialist (talk) 02:07, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, all editors should have a chance to review this alleged porn parody for themselves. E Eng 20:09, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:44, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:44, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I think it's great to have more articles about notable animated shorts. Unfortunately, based on what I can see with Google, this just doesn't seem to be one. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:45, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.