Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Multiple Sculpture / Multilateral Sculpture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:14, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Multiple Sculpture / Multilateral Sculpture

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sculptor Rasto Hlavina (User:RHlav) has created an article about his own sculpture. I prodded it as advertising, and he contested it on the talk page, asserting that if we delete it, we are the "tool of crafty individuals" and "the pond in the game of pretension", and that we should leave the article "straight from the horse's mouth". Of course, that conflicts with Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and WP:SPAM. Wikipedia is not a free webhost for artists to describe and promote their own work. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:57, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not only is it self-promoting, but it isn't even a coherent subject for an article. —Torchiest ^talk/_edits 19:48, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable, no significant coverage. --Nuujinn (talk) 10:34, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Obvious advertising. Drewbug (talk) 20:49, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.