Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Penny Dreadfuls Present...

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Penny Dreadfuls. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:23, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Penny Dreadfuls Present...

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/The Penny Dreadfuls Present...

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

The Penny Dreadfuls Present... (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All of this information is now part of The Penny Dreadfuls. Additionally, it confuses The Brothers Faversham and The Penny Dreadfuls Present..., and I'm not sure they warrant two separate articles.Professionalecho (talk) 22:44, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 22:57, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 22:57, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 22:58, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 23:01, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to The Penny Dreadfuls where there is already and episode listing for "The Penny Dreadfuls Present..." - the radio program itself has no significant coverage in multiple, reliable secondary sources - in the article, two of the references are to listings and the one to Chortle is a press release of upcoming comedy shows - no evidence of inedpendent notability - Epinoia (talk) 02:31, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect: per rationale of User:Epinoia. Otr500 (talk) 08:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.