Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pinnacle@Duxton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep #1. Nomination withdrawn by nominator. non-admin closure --Bejnar (talk) 00:11, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Pinnacle@Duxton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional Article Jayakumar RG (talk) 16:34, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article states that the site has historical significance (among the oldest HDB flats in Singapore), the sky gardens are the longest in the world, the towers are the tallest public housing in the world and Pinnacle@Duxton won a prestigious award by an international body. All these facts are cited to reliable sources. Since notability is not in doubt, promotional tone (to be honest, the tone is not that promotional) is grounds for rewriting, not deleting. --Hildanknight (talk) 12:10, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The site does have historical significance, but the article is largely about the residential complex that stands there now. Isn't it rather odd that the main picture featured in the article is not an actual photograph but a computer generated one, the kind usually provided by developers for advertisement? I am concerned about COI. Jayakumar RG (talk) 13:14, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The world records and award are for the residential complex that stands there now. I reviewed the article history, which does not suggest COI. If the image is not suitable for the article, feel free to remove it. --Hildanknight (talk) 13:41, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination withdrawn Notability has been clarified. Promotional look can be reworked. Jayakumar RG (talk) 14:03, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.